Project 2025 Happening NOW: The Supreme Court
Was I the only one who screamed at Christo-fascist justices multiple times last week? (Scroll to the end to listen)
To understand how we arrived at a Christo-fascist majority on the Supreme Court, we only need to know one name: Leonard Leo.
Many stories have been written about Leo’s involvement in the selection of far-right Christo-fascist Supreme Court justices, but ProPublica has covered his involvement in the Christo-fascist transformation of the judiciary at every level. He has been working on this takeover for DECADES.
From ProPublica:
Decades ago, Leonard Leo realized it was not enough to have a majority of Supreme Court justices. To undo landmark rulings like Roe, his movement would need to make sure the court heard the right cases brought by the right people and heard by the right lower court judges.
Leo began building a machine to do just that. He didn’t just cultivate friendships with conservative Supreme Court justices, arranging private jet trips, joining them on vacation, brokering speaking engagements. He also drew on his network of contacts to place Federalist Society protégés in clerkships, judgeships and jobs in the White House and across the federal government.
Source: ProPublica
Christian Nationalist Republican politicians and attorneys, judges and justices are key to the implementation of Project 2025 at the state level. Strategically, cases start in (red) states, wind through (favorable) federal courts, and then land on the docket of the (6-3 Conservative) Supreme Court.
Even if Republicans lose the White House and Congress in November, Christo-fascist Republicans will continue to use red states and the unelected federal judiciary to implement Project 2025 piecemeal. Either way, their goal is to transform the United States into a Christo-fascist theocracy.
Red states with Republican supermajorities are already well on their way to Christo-fascist theocratic government. Here’s a sample of how their leaders have already used the judiciary and Supreme Court to enact Project 2025 objectives.
Be forewarned. This newsletter is longer than normal because they are already doing a lot.
ABORTION, CONTRACEPTION, AND WOMEN’S HEALTHCARE
HHS should return to being known as the Department of Life by explicitly rejecting the notion that abortion is health care and by restoring its mission statement under the Strategic Plan and elsewhere to include furthering the health and well-being of all Americans “from conception to natural death.”
Project 2025, page 489
Red-state abortion bans fulfill this policy objective. The Alabama IVF ruling is an outgrowth of this policy position. Red-state attempts to ban IUDs and emergency contraception, and eventually ALL contraception, are part of protecting life “from conception to natural death.”
Of course, the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v Wade was part of Leo’s strategy to use a Christo-fascist judiciary to overturn the right to abortion. But the Supreme Court has agreed to hear other cases tailored to overturning other women’s healthcare rights. These cases are designed to be heard and decided favorably by this Christo-fascist Supreme Court.
Idaho v United States (the EMTALA case)
EMTALA is a federal law that requires hospitals to provide stabilizing healthcare to patients in emergency situations, whether or not they have the ability to pay. It was passed during the Reagan administration.
The state of Idaho has a total abortion ban with an exception only to save the mother’s life. Abortion cannot be provided if her health is in danger but death isn’t considered imminent.
Idaho argued that EMTALA should not supersede their abortion prohibitions. Most Christo-fascist justices seemed open to that argument. If they rule in Idaho’s favor, women’s healthcare will deteriorate further in red states because more states will refuse to provide stabilizing abortions to protect the mother’s health.
17 Red States v the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Last week, 17 red-state attorneys general sued the EEOC regarding the federal requirement to provide reasonable accommodations for employee pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions, including abortion. These AGs object to being forced to provide any accommodation to facilitate abortion since it is banned in their states.
There is little doubt this case will make its way to the Supreme Court, where it will have a reception similar to the Idaho EMTALA case.
FDA v the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case)
The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine judge-shopped for a 45-appointed Christo-fascist judge to overturn the approval of mifepristone, one of two drugs used to self-induce abortions. The Supreme Court heard this case in March. Both Thomas and Alito brought up using the Comstock Act to ban this drug nationwide.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
One of Project 2025’s overarching goals is to gut the federal government’s ability to regulate businesses and states.
Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council
The Chevron rule essentially gave government experts the ability to interpret ambiguities within government statues. Federal experts knew more about their specific areas than politicians did, and using experts would save members of Congress a lot of time.
The Christo-fascist justices seem posed to overturn or severely limit Chevron, which will have consequences across the nation. Approvals of sweeping legislation could take much longer if Congress must weigh in on every point. All prior federal approvals could also be challenged., which could create chaos.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Whether it be mask and vaccine mandates, school and business closures, efforts to keep Americans from driving gas cars or using gas stoves, or efforts to defund the police, indoctrinate schoolchildren, alter beloved books, abridge free speech, undermine the colorblind ideal, or deny the biological reality that there are only two sexes, the Left’s steady stream of insanity appears to be never-ending.
Project 2025, page 13
Affirmative Action Gutted for University Admissions
In 2023, the Supreme Court overturned the use of affirmative action for admission to colleges and universities as part of achieving Project 2025’s “colorblind ideal.”
Numerous lawsuits to gut DEI policies
Readers can find out more about this effort led by 45 villain Stephen Miller at the link in the heading above.
This is a sample of how Christo-fascist red-state Republicans have partnered with a Christo-fascist judiciary to overturn decades of precedent.
Various justices have indicated they are open to enforcing the Comstock Act, which would outlaw abortion and most contraception nationwide. They have also expressed interest in rolling back the right to same-sex sexual relations and same-sex marriage. Thomas even threatened the settled right to use of contraception between married people.
For any skeptic of Project 2025 as a Christo-fascist manifesto, reasonable people should consider what they have already accomplished via the far-right judiciary. I hope these talking points and connections to Project 2025 will be persuasive in the coming weeks and months.
LATE ADDITION - RELIGIOUS INDOCTRINATION FOR WELFARE ASSISTANCE
wrote an excellent newsletter about the Supreme Court’s hearing on homelessness and tied it to forced religious indoctrination for welfare assistance. Read more HERE.And read more about this Project 2025 policy objective at the link below:
Leonard Leo is with Opus Dei to appoint Supreme Court judges.
https://dailymeditationswithmatthewfox.org/22/06/29/supreme-court-judges-sharing-an-opus-dei-seal-of-approval/
If I didn’t load this correctly it’s in my “notes”. The article contains information of Opus Dei’s connection to fascism and how it mirrors what is in the Project 2025 document regarding women’s non-rights and place in society. The current Pope has cautioned about Opus Dei stepping away from the authority of the Church.
As Protestant Christians are starting to realize - what the Supreme Court and Project 2025 are selling isn’t the teachings of Jesus Christ. It’s the worship of money and power. 2Peter2
Read there for the fate that awaits those who follow the path of enslaving fellow Americans.
A first instinct is to think, 'Why can't a liberal / progressive do something like what Leonard Leo did?' But the answer immediately follows. It takes resources; it takes wealth. And it's rare for wealth to align with goodness. It's one of Jesus' most emphasized messages. The irony. Except it's not so ironic because he warned us about false holiness.